Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility A Winning Framework to Recover from Uber, Lyft and other Transportation Network Companies (TNCs): Liability theories, pleadings, discovery, and strategies | SemWebCatalog

Share this program:

Live Webinars

A Winning Framework to Recover from Uber, Lyft and other Transportation Network Companies (TNCs)

Liability theories, pleadings, discovery, and strategies

What You Will Learn

  • Learn the seven principal liability theories available against a TNC defendant that apply nationwide and the statutory, regulatory, and common-law bases for liability
  • Know the textual, structural, and judicial-estoppel arguments that distinguish a labor-classification provision from substantive tort immunity
  • Adapt field-tested sample written discovery and person-most-qualified (or Rule 30(b)(6)) deposition notices to a TNC defendant in any U.S. jurisdiction
  • Address driver onboarding and background screening, complaint history and deactivation flags, GPS and telematics data, in-app safety features and public safety representations, regulatory compliance, the three TNC insurance coverage periods, and algorithmic ride-matching systems
  • Develop an opposition strategy to a TNC’s motion for summary judgment or motion to dismiss that addresses common defenses
  • Translate model arguments into the language of your jurisdiction

Share this program:

What You Will Learn

  • Learn the seven principal liability theories available against a TNC defendant that apply nationwide and the statutory, regulatory, and common-law bases for liability
  • Know the textual, structural, and judicial-estoppel arguments that distinguish a labor-classification provision from substantive tort immunity
  • Adapt field-tested sample written discovery and person-most-qualified (or Rule 30(b)(6)) deposition notices to a TNC defendant in any U.S. jurisdiction
  • Address driver onboarding and background screening, complaint history and deactivation flags, GPS and telematics data, in-app safety features and public safety representations, regulatory compliance, the three TNC insurance coverage periods, and algorithmic ride-matching systems
  • Develop an opposition strategy to a TNC’s motion for summary judgment or motion to dismiss that addresses common defenses
  • Translate model arguments into the language of your jurisdiction
Register Now

Need login details for your webinar?

Wednesday, July 8, 2026

2PM CENTRAL
(3:00 ET / 12:00 PT / 1:00 MT)

Copy to Calendar:

Reminder: Adding to your calendar does not register you for the webinar.
Price

$99 for Association Member
$129 for Non-member

75 minutes
Publisher

Consumer Attorneys of San Diego

Subjects

Auto Accidents, Liability

Questions

Already Registered? Refer to confirmation e-mail for connection instructions.

Something else? Please consult our FAQ page. If you're unable to find the answer you need, please call 737-201-2059 (M-F, 8am-6pm CT) or e-mail customer service.

Summary

This program presents a framework to recover from Uber, Lyft and other Transportation Network Companies (TNCs) built around seven principal liability theories: (1) motor-vehicle negligence; (2) statutory imputation under the carrier’s public-utilities or motor-carrier permit; (3) common-carrier liability; (4) regulated-hirer vicarious liability; (5) ostensible or apparent agency arising from the rideshare brand and customer-facing app; (6) direct corporate negligence, including negligent hiring, retention, and supervision; and (7) negligent undertaking.

Arash Homamapour integrates examples throughout his presentation to illustrate how the same seven theories operate under different statutory texts, so you are equipped to file, propound, and oppose in your own cases, regardless of the jurisdiction.

Materials include pleading, discovery, and motion templates: a sample complaint pleading all seven TNC liability theories; sample special interrogatories targeting permit operations, driver complaint history, and the algorithmic ride-matching apparatus; sample requests for production reaching driver ratings, deactivation flags, GPS and telematics data, and in-app safety representations; a sample person-most-qualified (or Rule 30(b)(6)) deposition notice covering permit conditions, safety protocols, training, and complaint handling; and a sample opposition to a TNC’s motion for summary judgment built around the statutory-imputation framework.

SWL-27900

Expand summary
back to top

Presenters

Arash Homampour 

Arash Homampour Has Obtained Over $1 Billion Dollars In Settlements, Verdicts And Judgments For His Clients.He is a trial... Read More

back to top

Agenda

5 Minutes - Introduction
60 Minutes - Presentation
10 Minutes - Live Q&A with the Speaker

back to top

Credit

If applicable, you may obtain credit in multiple jurisdictions simultaneously for this program (see pending/approved list below). Registrants in jurisdictions not listed below will receive a Certificate of Attendance/Completion that may or may not meet credit requirements in other jurisdictions. Where applicable, credit will be only awarded to a paid registrant attending the live program at their own computer and phone.

Click on jurisdiction for specific details:

back to top

How to Attend

Join the live program from your office, home, or hotel room using a computer with high speed internet. You may ask questions, participate in evaluations, and post comments from your computer during the program. Please note that credit (if available) is only provided to registered attendees participating at their own computer and phone. Simple instructions with a link to the program will be sent when you register and again the day before the webinar.

back to top

More

Refund Policy
SeminarWeb and Alabama Association for Justice programs are non-refundable.

Privacy Statement
We respect and are committed to protecting your privacy. Read Statement.

YOU MAY ALSO BE INTERESTED IN...

Demystifying Autopilot

On Demand

Jan 15


logo
© 2024 by Alabama Association for Justice.
Website design by Cartography